State, religion and humanism

The right constitution

For Kant, in Critique of pure Reason, the just constitution is the one that gives the greatest possible freedom to individuals.

For the partisan of a residual clericalism, would the just constitution be the one that incites individuals to save their souls, with the help of the Church?

Where are the intellectuals of Fribourg?

The queen of science has gone from theology in the Middle Ages to economics today. Like the Fribourg radicals who have changed sides (yesterday's anticlericals now support the residues of clericalism), intellectuals have little criticism to make of the clerical regime. Are they satisfied with a simple attenuation of clericalism or are they usurping their title as intellectuals? For those who are concerned about their careers, the opportunism of those who know where the places of power are is more profitable than the critical spirit. To be recited piously every day: "Religion, Catholicism in particular, is an excellent thing to support. Vote for the church tax and give public funding to the Roman Catholic theological faculty".

The debates of the Great Council of the Canton of Fribourg
remain under the sign of the crucifix [photo 2017].

Why do the many advocates of less state intervention exclude religion from the scope of their principles?

The new generation looks better. In Switzerland, certain sections of the young radicals and young socialists have taken a clear stance in favour of secularism. But their elders are urging them to mute it.

Christian humanism

Christian humanism is a misleading expression: the human side is used as a diversion. It is in fact a theological vision of man in which God is at the centre, a kind of theocracy, draped in democracy, in which the clergy is the guide for the action of the state. That is how I was taught at the teacher training college in the canton of Valais, in the name of the social encyclicals of the Church that we read in class, that the worst enemy of humanity is socialism, and that every true Christian has a moral duty to vote for a Christian party, i.e. for the Christian Democrat party (see Clericalism, never again! - Testimony).

Whereas Christian humanism is a city built around a cathedral and a Catholic theological faculty under the patronage of a clerical state, all surrounded by the rampart of Greek and Latin culture, true humanism places the public square, human rights, democracy and secular culture at the centre.

I am wary of humanisms that have a vision of a tomorrow that sings, whether in this world or in another. True humanism refuses to subordinate itself to any religion, otherwise it loses its quality of humanism. Humanism consists in reinforcing the primacy of man over all ideologies that demand submission to other values.

CONTENTS of the blog



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clericalism, never again! - Testimony

The menace of hell

Resisting the teaching of the Church: human rights, morals, secular culture